<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords Introduces Google Gadget Ads</title>
	<link>http://www.smaaz.com/2007/09/19/google-adwords-introduces-google-gadget-ads/</link>
	<description>Webmaster Blog with Search Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing related articles!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan the finder</title>
		<link>http://www.smaaz.com/2007/09/19/google-adwords-introduces-google-gadget-ads/#comment-20124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan the finder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.smaaz.com/2007/09/19/google-adwords-introduces-google-gadget-ads/#comment-20124</guid>
		<description>If it is something what could lower the "MFA ads" vs. "normal ads" ration, then I welcome it a lot. On the other hand, an ordinary text link looks more natural, so maybe the Flash ads could lower the CTR (?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it is something what could lower the &#8220;MFA ads&#8221; vs. &#8220;normal ads&#8221; ration, then I welcome it a lot. On the other hand, an ordinary text link looks more natural, so maybe the Flash ads could lower the CTR (?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
